View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Jul 18, 2018 11:44 am



Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
 Greenpeace Activists Flew Superman Drone Into Nuclear Plant 
Author Message
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:40 pm
Posts: 2792
Location: Illinois
Quote:
A pair of drones operated by Greenpeace activists flew straight into the Electricity de France’s (EDF) nuclear power plant located in Bugey, near Lyon.

French police reportedly managed to intercept one of the drones while the other, adorned with a miniature Superman costume, crashed into a spent fuel storage facility.


FULL STORY HERE: https://sputniknews.com/europe/201807041066049804-nuclear-plant-drone-collision/

_________________
MY OUTSIDE RADIATION MONITORING STATION:
South Beloit, Illinois - GMC200 Outside on HEPA air purifier, ground level, facing West.
http://netc.com/chart/view.php?n=1%3AEB5A139C


Thu Jul 05, 2018 11:28 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:40 pm
Posts: 2792
Location: Illinois
Here is a CNN video that shows in depth about the remote control device "SUPERMAN" that I believe was used to fly in to the nuclear plants spent fuel building.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpO1D23IWhw

_________________
MY OUTSIDE RADIATION MONITORING STATION:
South Beloit, Illinois - GMC200 Outside on HEPA air purifier, ground level, facing West.
http://netc.com/chart/view.php?n=1%3AEB5A139C


Thu Jul 05, 2018 11:36 am
Profile

Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2018 1:22 pm
Posts: 5
.
LiveLeak.com - Video - Superman Crashes Into Nuclear Power Plant

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=9zKQb_1530631492

-
My Opinion: The 'Nuclear-Power Industry' needs to Review their 'Nuclear-Power "Security" Policies-and-Procedures' .
.


Thu Jul 05, 2018 11:55 am
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:40 pm
Posts: 2792
Location: Illinois
Forbes magazine has a recent article titled "If Nuclear Plants Are So Vulnerable To Terrorist Attack, Why Don't Terrorists Attack Them?" in an attempt to play down the actual vulnerability. Let me point out some things in their article.

Quote:
The pools he’s referring to are what the used fuel rods are temporarily cooled in before being recycled.


When they say temporarily, they do not mention that the fuel rods have to stay in the pool for 5-7 years before they are cool enough to safely be exposed to air. I hardly consider this temporary!

LINK TO ARTICLE: https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2018/07/06/if-nuclear-plants-are-so-vulnerable-to-terrorist-attack-why-dont-terrorists-attack-them/#527400395877

_________________
MY OUTSIDE RADIATION MONITORING STATION:
South Beloit, Illinois - GMC200 Outside on HEPA air purifier, ground level, facing West.
http://netc.com/chart/view.php?n=1%3AEB5A139C


Sun Jul 08, 2018 2:53 pm
Profile
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:40 pm
Posts: 2792
Location: Illinois
:arrow: The same article mentioned above talks about how there is no threat of a 9/11 type attack on nuclear plants. It is worth mentioning that while the actual reactors likely can withstand a 9/11 type attack because of the thick concrete, but the spent fuel pool building can not. The spent fuel rods building often has the most fuel rods at any given time on most nuclear plant sites.

_________________
MY OUTSIDE RADIATION MONITORING STATION:
South Beloit, Illinois - GMC200 Outside on HEPA air purifier, ground level, facing West.
http://netc.com/chart/view.php?n=1%3AEB5A139C


Sun Jul 08, 2018 2:57 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 5 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by STSoftware.